This article compares different approaches for estimating cross-lagged effects with a cross-lagged panel design under a causal inference perspective. We distinguish between models that rely on no unmeasured confounding (i.e., observed covariates are sufficient to remove confounding) and latent variable-type models (e.g., random intercept cross-lagged panel model) that use parametric assumptions to adjust for unmeasured time-invariant confounding by including additional latent variables. Simulation studies confirm that the cross-lagged panel model provides biased estimates of the cross-lagged effect in the presence of unmeasured confounding. However, the simulations also show that the latent variable-type approaches strongly depend on the specific parametric assumptions, and produce biased estimates under different data-generating scenarios. Finally, we discuss the role of the longitudinal design and the limitations of assessing model fit for estimating cross-lagged effects.
Original languageEnglish
JournalStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)888-907
Publication statusPublished - 02.11.2022
No renderer: handleNetPortal,dk.atira.pure.api.shared.model.researchoutput.ContributionToJournal

    Research areas

  • Methodological research and method development - Causal inference, cross-lagged effect, cross-lagged panel modellongitudinal datarandom intercept cross-lagged panel model, longitudinal data, random intercept cross-lagged panel model

ID: 1895188